The high adaptability of AMRs to the current needs of a production facility is an important aspect of building a competitive advantage. SummaryĪll the properties of intralogistics systems based on AMRs result in a relatively fast return on investment. AMRs are slower than belt conveyors but ensure regular and reliable deliveries, for example, small parts between work centres or between warehouses and production facilities. An additional argument in their favour is the high probability that once assembled, the conveyor system will not require any modifications or reconfigurations for long enough that a depreciation of the investment will be possible.ĪMRs are a perfect fit wherever belt conveyors cannot be assembled due to technical or financial reasons, or if they are unjustified due to the need for frequent modifications of logistics processes.

If the main goal is to ensure speed and efficiency of transport on fixed routes, the belt conveyors and monorail systems are decidedly a better solution. Fully automated belt conveyors require physical access control, as well as monitoring the operation of the entire system in case of disturbances and potential threats to the people working in the vicinity. One of the most important aspects of conveyor system operation is the problem of ensuring safety.

Even the smallest changes require huge financial expenses, primarily due to very costly downtimes and stoppages in transport and, consequently, in production. Repair and maintenance service people have to be extremely efficient in their work, in order to maintain the continuity of logistics processes. Intralogistics based on belt conveyors and monorail systems are characterised by very high efficiency.Ī definite weak point of conveyors and monorail lines is that a malfunction of just one element halts the entire line. However, high implementation costs are compensated for by the speed of operation.

It requires a precise design, setting up transfer stations, and testing of the entire system. Assembling a conveyor system is a large, expensive, and time-consuming investment. Belt conveyors and monorail systems: unbeatable efficiencyīelt conveyors, much like monorail systems, cannot be called a flexible solution. Their design does not necessitate ‘human exclusion zones’ in warehouses and factory halls. Autonomous robots can work with people, but also with other modes of transport, such as forklifts or industrial tractors. Robot traffic can therefore be sustained very efficiently – processes are completed in a continuous cycle, practically without downtime.Įnsuring work safety is also a tremendously important feature of AMR implementation. All repair and maintenance services of an AMR fleet are possible without affecting the overall execution of logistics processes. In the event of robot breakdown, the logistics process does not stop – tasks assigned to the malfunctioning machine are given to another one, which can be done ‘on the fly’. Thanks to this, logistics can stay flexible in the face of ever-changing manufacturing conditions. The change in collection and delivery points of goods takes place very quickly, and the costs of robot changeover are minimal. The flexibility of AMRs also applies to route changes and reconfigurations to perform new tasks. The only interference is the installation of a charging station, as well as the preparation of load collection and delivery points. Thanks to its ability to map the surroundings, the machine can navigate without the need for markers or landmarks. The implementation of AMRs is possible without the need for extensive changes in the architecture, equipment, or amenities of a given facility. It primarily concerns their quick and easy adjustment to existing working conditions. The biggest advantage of AGV robots, especially Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) such as VERSABOT 500 and VERSABOT 1000, is their multifaceted flexibility. When considering choosing a specific solution, you should be aware of the advantages and limitations of the three intralogistics systems mentioned above. The choice between the two means of transport is dependent on whether speed or flexibility of transport management is a top priority. In some cases, they can be treated as complementary solutions. Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) robots are often combined with conveyor belts and monorail systems.

Robot on agv